In a recent statement, Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar addressed the significance of the Preamble of the Constitution and highlighted a crucial distinction between its unalterable nature and the changes made to Bharat’s identity. He emphasized that while the Preamble stands as a foundational element of the Constitution, reflecting the core values and principles of the nation, the nomenclature of ‘Bharat’ has undergone alterations, raising questions about the motivations behind such changes. This commentary opens a broader discussion on the integrity of constitutional provisions and the underlying philosophies that guide the governance of the country.
Dhankhar’s remarks underscore a fundamental aspect of constitutional law—the sanctity of the Preamble, which embodies the aspirations of the people and the ethos of the nation. The Preamble establishes the framework for justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity, serving as a guiding light for all legislative and judicial actions. The fact that it remains unalterable speaks to the enduring values that have shaped India’s identity and the collective consciousness of its citizens. Yet, the modifications to the term ‘Bharat’ evoke a sense of curiosity and concern regarding the implications of such changes on national identity.
The Vice President’s inquiry into the reasons behind altering ‘Bharat’ invites a critical examination of the motivations that drive constitutional amendments and the broader implications for societal cohesion. It raises important questions about the balance between tradition and modernity, as well as the role of historical context in shaping contemporary governance. As India continues to evolve as a democracy, the dialogue surrounding constitutional changes and their impact on national identity remains vital. The essence of Dhankhar’s message is a call for introspection and a careful consideration of how changes to foundational elements can influence the unity and integrity of the nation in the long run.
